Monthly Archives: February 2022

Why All Poetics Must Ultimately be Considered as Geopoetics

On 18th January 2022 we welcomed Oliver Dawson, a final year PhD student at University of Bristol, to Landscape Surgery. Oliver’s thesis, titled “Poetic Cartographies and Ecosophic Thought” focuses on poetry as a process of encountering non-human forces which operate within this world, disrupting its obvious and performative imagination of worlds.

About

After finishing his Undergraduate degree in American Literature at the University of Sussex, Oliver began working in the arts and cultural sector and ran The Poetry School, an organisation based in London which provides poetry writing classes for adults. Through this organisation, Oliver was introduced to a range of poets and began to explore the contemporary poetry scene in the UK. The organisation saw people from all walks of life engage with poetry, many of whom went on to publish their work and return to teach at the The Poetry School.

Oliver went on to study an MSc in Human Geography: Society and Space at the University of Bristol where the university’s strong philosophical roots influenced his approach to poetry. Through his exposure to the works of thinkers such as Spinoza, Deleuze and Guattari, Oliver began to approach poetry as an encounter with impersonal forces and sensations.

Research and Influences

Whilst Oliver did not set out his career as a ‘geographer’ he states that he is on a journey to become a geographer. The combination of his studies, work and research have situated his research within cultural and historical geography, with a particular interest in geopoetics.

“Geography is not confined to providing historical form with a substance and variable places. It is not merely physical and human but mental, like the landscape” Deleuze & Guattari 1994: 96

Guattari has had significant influence on Oliver’s research; his thesis aims to enact a certain ecosophic thought traditionally associated with Guattari, focusing on the combined importance of mental, social, and environmental domains in the production of subjectivity.

A creative multiplicity: the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari | Aeon  Essays
Deleuze & Guattari. Image Source: https://bit.ly/DeleuzeGuattari

Ecosophic thought centres on how thinking these domains together actively composes a ‘wisdom of the home’. Oliver talked us through the understanding processes and productions of subjectivity as more than human, as a process which always involves non-human forces and therefore can be seen as a way of “thinking with the earth”.

“Something in the world forces us to think. This something is an object not of recognition but of a fundamental encounter.” – Deleuz, 1998

Oliver’s research aim therefore, is to think of poetry as an operational part of this world, as opposed to a commentary of the world. “Once poetry is a commentary it is a representation and confirmation of existing thoughts and ideas, the realities of what we already know”. Discussing the climate emergency, he argues that geopoetics should be less attached to commenting and responding to preconceived problems. Instead we should use geopoetics as a way of thinking with the earth when addressing realities such as the climate emergency. Oliver states that he has resisted engaging with ‘obvious’ poetry within his field such as eco-poetry, in doing so he establishes the challenges of geopoetics as not thinking from the self but instead thinking with the forces of the earth, deterritorialising the language used by thinking without a ground or foundation. By removing the ‘ground’, poetry and language have the potential to connect with the changes and movements of the earth.

His research reveals an interest in the relation of poetry and language, and understanding language as a system which covets order. In his attempt to address the asignifying side of language, Oliver draws on the disruption to order, by assigning events with poetry as ‘sites of disruption’ for performative ways of thinking. This has influenced his research methodology whereby he takes onboard the experience of meeting a poet, reading their work as well as the work which has influenced them, and then introducing his own philosophy. This method allows Oliver to be alert to the potential eruption of ideas by letting things emerge through the encounter, disrupting habitual patterns of thought and altering the production of subjectivity in novel, unpredictable ways.

Oliver sees geopoetics as a field he would like to explore further, potentially through the publication of a book. He is particularly interested in further exploring the meaning within the ‘geo’ and how his approach to poetry can act as a contribution to geopoetics as a whole.

We would like to thank Oliver for sharing with us his thought-provoking research and look forward to seeing his further exploration of geopoetics.

By Evie Gilbert

DELEUZE, G. & GUATTARI, F. 1994. What is philosophy?, New York, Columbia University Press.

Tagged , ,

In Conversation with Ed Armston-Sheret

Landscape Surgery@25

Landscape Surgery Alumni 2017-2021 

About

Ed Armston-Sheret completed his PhD at Royal Holloway in the Geography department in 2021. His PhD, titled ‘Exploring Bodies: Recentring the Body in Histories of British Exploration, c.1850–1914,’ investigated the history of exploration and the bodies of explorers and those they travelled with. By offering a new perspective on Victorian exploration, Ed’s research is attentive to the contributions and experiences of people who are often ignored in mainstream histories of exploration, such as the porters who carried explorers’ equipment, sailors who worked on the ships, and so on. Ed is also interested in the role of animals in exploration and the collaboration between humans and animals on expeditions. 

Ed now works for the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG) in the Research and Higher Education Team.  

What are your reflections on the atmosphere and the community of Landscape Surgery? 

I always enjoyed going to Landscape Surgery. It was a nice community and there were always lots of fantastic discussions – it always made me realise what a broad discipline geography is. As a historical geographer you often have certain types of conversations, but interacting with people from the broader research group was always interesting to learn about something slightly different and seek parallels between that and your own work. It also created a cohort of PhD students who went through it at the same time which I think was really valuable in terms of building up a community spirit.  

What do you remember about who was there when you were a part of Landscape Surgery, and can you remember any of the key topics or trends that were spoken about? 

I remember in my second year of Landscape Surgery organising a session which was on the history of exploration. We used some funds from Landscape Surgery to invite Vanessa Heggie, who is doing some interesting research on extreme environment physiology, to speak. I remembered that talk because she is a fantastic scholar, and it was great to meet her.  

Session can be found here. 

There was a great talk from Flora Parrott, Rachel Squire, and Pete Adey on analogic spaces, caves, and the ends of the earth.  

Session can be found here 

I also remember discussing the project Making Suburban Faith with Natalie Hyacinth, a PhD student working on the project. Making Suburban Faith explores how suburban faith communities create space and focuses on eight different faith communities in Ealing in West London. Laura Cuch presented her film, Spiritual Flavours, at Landscape Surgery which is part of the wider Making Suburban Faith research project. 

Session can be found here 

I always enjoyed the first year presentations which I thought was a good aspect of Landscape Surgery. You would meet people in Landscape Surgery, but you didn’t always know what they were researching, therefore it was always fantastic to get people to talk about their research.   

What impact do you feel Landscape Surgery had on your work as a student? 

I think it was always the chance encounters and conversations you would have with people which was productive in terms of thinking about your own research. You would say what you had been up to, and someone would suggest something to read or give ideas to think about which was really useful. Conceptually I remember it being invaluable because the value of collaborative working is something I end up talking about in my own research. I think the importance of collaborative work within geography is something you realise by doing it, it’s not just specific conversations but working with other people which contributes to your own work. 

How did Covid-19 change the space of Landscape Surgery and impact the relationships between people at Landscape Surgery? 

I think the talks are still valuable online. A good thing was that you could have speakers from a wider cross-section of geography, as people couldn’t necessarily come to London. However, I did miss the in-person element. Working online affects the networking aspect of Landscape Surgery and getting to know people. 

Why do you think Landscape Surgery has been so successful? 

I think because it has got a lot of support from everyone in the department – people will try and attend the sessions. Also, people are interested in each other’s research, it’s a good way of hearing about that – it has become an established way for people to talk about their research. 

How important do you think the students who join Landscape Surgery are to its continued success? 

The students are incredibly important to Landscape Surgery. I think they are the centre of it in many ways as it keeps breathing new life into the surgeries, especially the first year presentations which are great because it gives students the opportunity to talk about their new research. As students play such an important role in organising Landscape Surgery sessions, keeping the blog up-to-date and so on, it is a good way of students gaining experience. 

What would you hope Landscape Surgery to achieve or continue to achieve in the next 25 years? 

One of the talks I remember, organised by Saskia Papadakis, was titled Why is my research group so white? I couldn’t attend but I remember talking to people about it afterwards and it started a really good conversation about the lack of diversity in geography in many ways. If I was to go forward 25 years, I would like Landscape Surgery to be more diverse, more representative of people who are currently excluded from academic geography. Some of that is down to Landscape Surgery, but we also need to put pressures on the wider system to make changes that need to happen.

Interview conducted by Beth Williamson 

Tagged , ,

In Conversation with David Rooney

  Landscape Surgery@25

Landscape Surgery Alumni 2010-2016  

About

David Rooney completed his PhD in 2016 in Royal Holloway’s Geography department. His PhD research, supervised by David Gilbert, is titled ‘The Traffic Problem: Geographies, Politics and Technologies of Congestion in Twentieth Century London’ and explores movement in the country’s capital at the intersection of political, geographic and technological spheres. David is a writer and curator and has spent 25 years working in science and maritime museums. His latest book ‘About Time, A History of Civilisation in Twelve Clocks’ is based on 15 years of research into why civilisations make clocks and why we should understand them better.  

A link to David’s website, with information on his new book other books and exhibitions can be found here.  

David joined Landscape Surgery around the same time he started his PhD in 2010. During his time in Landscape Surgery, David gave 2 presentations. In 2011 he worked alongside Mustafa Dikec and Carlos Alveros Galves on their project exploring time distribution and infrastructure in cities. In 2015 David presented his PhD research on traffic congestion in 20th century London, drawing on London as a global city through which he studied global flows of capital. 

What are your reflections on the atmosphere and the community of Landscape Surgery?  

Landscape Surgery and the Geography department was a big community, they had the most supportive, warm, inclusive and encouraging people I have ever worked within in my career. We met in Bedford square, which was a small room and you had to fight to get a seat! It was always sociable, you would be able to talk about work but also have social and moral support from the Landscape Surgery community.  

What do you remember about who was there, and what were the key topics/trends/turns? 

The diversity of topics was notable, all of the presentations were so far from your own research study but it did not matter because the work was all so thoughtful that you gain a lot out of everyone’s work. There was always a sense of togetherness and sharing, like a flat hierarchy. The presentation topic was only part of it, hearing people’s approach to their studies was something I had never experienced before and being able to see new ways of thinking and approaching research. You could apply other people’s approaches to your own studies even though your topics were worlds apart.  

What impact do you feel Landscape Surgery had on your work as a student and then later as a researcher?  

Landscape Surgery has definitely impacted my work now. It was so inclusive, so sharing, with no gatekeeping. People wanted everyone to benefit, and that’s something I have taken into my own work, I want to meet people and be able to share my work with them.  

Why do you think Landscape Surgery has been so successful?  

People feel like they are part of something bigger. My experience wasn’t unique though, I think that feeling applies to everyone. It was so inclusive that it encourages you to stay connected and stay involved.  

How important are the students who join Landscape Surgery to its continued success/ progression/ development? 

The inclusivity and sense of community among the students are what makes them want to be a part of it, and which helps with its success and its progression.  

What would you hope Landscape Surgery to achieve/continue to achieve in the next 25 years?  

I would hope to see it go back to Bedford Square, and back to in-person meetings. Landscape Surgery needs the in-person element to create that exciting atmosphere, you could be sat next to a fellow student or a hero of your field and the democratic nature of Landscape Surgery meant that you could speak to and learn from anyone.  

Interview conducted by Evie Gilbert

Look out for our next blog on Ed Armston-Sheret, his work, and his experience of Landscape Surgery by Beth Williamson.

Tagged , ,

In Conversation with Ellie Miles

Landscape Surgery@25

Landscape Surgery Alumni 2008-2013

Ellie Miles was a Phd Student with Landscape Surgery between 2008 and 2013, completing a thesis on the subject ‘Curating the Global City’. Ellie specialises in online and digital curation, joining the London Transport Museum first as the Contemporary Collecting Curator and then later in her current role as Documentary Curator. Before joining the London Transport Museum Ellie also spent time as the Digital Curator at the Museum of London and as the Interpretations Officer at the British Museum.

As part of Ellie’s work, she is focussed on contemporary collecting, in particular exploring the ethical principles and practices which can inform museum curation. Ellie was also a visiting Lecturer at the University of Westminster for 2 years, where she developed and taught the course ‘Online Museums and Galleries’.  

Follow Ellie’s work on her blog here, and on twitter here.

Interview conducted by Cynthia Nkiruka Anyadi

Look out for the next blog on David Rooney, his work and his experience of Landscape Surgery by Evie Gilbert

Tagged